🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a rising number of nations are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," commented the European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the local level amid federal inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some individuals to copy this path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this international debate evolves, the policies of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.