🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Development

Observers said the apparent data breach could boost AI companies searching for material to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as performer and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would probably be utilized for developing AI models.

“Training on pirated data is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free version of the service”. He added it could also allow tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has become a key issue between artists, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have protested against a government proposal to let AI companies use protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.